Genomic Microarray (Oligo-SNP Array)
Cytogenomic SNP Microarray - Fetal is also a component of the following tests:
Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH)
- Rapid detection of aneuploidy involving chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y
- If results of aneuploidy FISH panel are normal, genomic microarray analysis will be performed
- If results of aneuploidy FISH panel are abnormal, chromosome analysis will be performed
- Performed on uncultured amniotic fluid
Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH)
- Rapid detection of aneuploidy involving chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y
- If results of aneuploidy FISH panel are normal, genomic microarray analysis will be performed
- If results of aneuploidy FISH panel are abnormal, chromosome analysis will be performed
- Performed on uncultured CVS
Giemsa Band/Genomic Microarray (Oligo-SNP Array)
- Chromosome analysis is used for detection of aneuploidy and other chromosomal abnormalities (eg, large deletions/duplications, translocations, inversions, marker chromosomes)
- If results of chromosome analysis are normal, genomic microarray analysis will be performed
For other fetal testing to detect cytogenetic abnormalities, refer to the ARUP Laboratory Test Directory.
Cytogenomic SNP microarray testing is used to identify genomic imbalances (deletions and duplications) and may be used to further characterize abnormalities identified by chromosome analysis, including unbalanced translocations, recombinant chromosomes, markers, and ring chromosomes. Regions of homozygosity (ROH) can also be identified. It is the recommended first-tier test for patients undergoing prenatal diagnosis for the indication of a fetal structural abnormality detected by ultrasound (unless the structural abnormality is strongly suggestive of a specific aneuploidy, in which case, karyotype with or without fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH] may be offered before genomic microarray).
Disease Overview
Diagnostic Issues
- Many abnormal phenotypes are associated with chromosomal imbalances.
- Chromosome analysis has limited ability to detect copy number abnormalities less than 10-15 Mb in size.
- Genomic microarray can detect chromosomal imbalances at a much higher level of resolution than standard chromosome analysis.
- Genomic microarray can detect ROH, which may indicate an increased risk for autosomal recessive (AR) disease for genes contained within the ROH, and/or the risk of an imprinting disorder due to uniparental disomy (UPD), or molar pregnancy.
- Identification of specific abnormalities may be helpful in medical management and planning for special needs.
Test Interpretation
Diagnostic Yield
- Among cases with a normal karyotype, microarray studies reveal clinically relevant copy number variants (CNVs) in :
- Approximately 6% of fetuses with a structural anomaly on ultrasound
- Percentage may be higher, depending on anomaly
- Approximately 2% whose indication is advanced maternal age or positive maternal serum screen
- Approximately 6% of fetuses with a structural anomaly on ultrasound
- After a positive cell-free fetal DNA (cfDNA) screening, the microarray yield ranges from 15% for microdeletions to 93% for trisomy 21.
- The diagnostic yield varies by patient population and the presence of comorbidities.
Results
- A written summary and an interpretation of the microarray findings are provided.
- CNV evaluation is performed in accordance with recommendations by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) , :
- Standard 5-tier classification terminology is used:
- Pathogenic
- Likely pathogenic
- Variant of uncertain significance (VUS)
- Likely benign
- Benign
- Variants that do not fall within these categories may be reported with descriptive language specific to that variant.
- Standard 5-tier classification terminology is used:
- For additional information regarding CNV classification, refer to the ARUP Constitutional Copy Number Variant Assertion Criteria.
- Additional resources can be found on the ARUP Genetics Resources website.
- Submission of a maternal blood sample for maternal cell contamination studies is encouraged.
Result | Description |
---|---|
Normal | No clinically significant CNV or ROH detected |
Abnormal | One or more pathogenic or likely pathogenic findings detected |
Uncertain | One or more CNVs of uncertain clinical significance detected
Uncertain ROH: risk for AR disease and/or imprinting disorder due to UPD
|
Reporting Criteria
- Deletions >1 Mb and duplications >2 Mb are generally reported, dependent on genomic content.
- CNVs classified as VUS are generally reported when found to have suspected clinical relevance based on information available at the time of review, or when meeting size criteria.
- Total autosomal homozygosity >5% is generally reported.
- Only autosomal ROH >3 Mb are considered for this estimate.
- Single terminal ROH >3 Mb or single interstitial ROH >10-20 Mb are generally reported, dependent upon chromosomal location and likelihood of imprinting disorder.
- In general, recessive disease risk will not be reported unless consistent with submitted clinical information.
- Known or expected pathogenic CNVs affecting genes with known clinical significance but which are unrelated to the indication for testing will generally be reported.
- CNVs classified as likely benign or benign that are devoid of relevant gene content or reported as common findings in the general population are generally not reported.
Limitations
- Does not detect:
- CNVs below the limit of resolution of the testing platform
- Sequence-level variants (mutations), including point mutations and small insertions/deletions
- Balanced chromosomal rearrangements (translocations, inversions, and insertions)
- Imbalances of the mitochondrial genome
- Low-level mosaicism (generally <20-30%)
- Most cases of tetraploidy
References
-
23215555
Wapner RJ, Martin CLese, Levy B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(23):2175-2184.
-
36403097
Grati FR, Bestetti I, De Siero D, et al. Positive predictive values and outcomes for uninformative cell-free DNA tests: an Italian multicentric Cytogenetic and cytogenomic Audit of diagnOstic testing (ICARO study). Prenat Diagn. 2022;42(13):1575-1586.
-
25741868
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405-424.
-
31690835
Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, et al. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) [published correction appears in Genet Med. 2021;23(11):2230]. Genet Med. 2020;22(2):245-257.
Detects small copy number variants (CNVs), regions of homozygosity (ROH), and further characterizes chromosomal abnormalities identified by conventional cytogenetic analysis of direct and cultured amniotic fluid and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) specimens.