Cite this page
FeedbackColorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer death and the fourth most common form of cancer in the United States. In recent years, both CRC incidence and CRC-related mortality have decreased, which underscores the importance of continued advances in CRC early detection, diagnosis, and care. Although sporadic colon cancers are more common, hereditary colon cancers are also frequent, and identification of these affects screening recommendations both for the individual and family members. CRC screening strategies rely on imaging, laboratory testing, or a combination of the two. Molecular testing of cancer tissue, including evaluation for microsatellite instability (MSI), is recommended to evaluate for Lynch syndrome (LS) risk and to inform prognosis. Monitoring of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is recommended following resection of most CRCs to detect recurrence. Laboratory testing may also be used to determine whether particular treatments are likely to be effective.
Quick Answers for Clinicians
Approximately one-fifth of colorectal cancers (CRCs) are related to a hereditary syndrome. Lynch syndrome (LS), or hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), accounts for 2-4% of colorectal cancer cases in the United States. Given the frequency of LS, multiple institutions have endorsed immunohistochemistry (IHC) and, in some cases, microsatellite instability (MSI) testing in all colorectal and endometrial cancers to determine which patients should receive germline genetic testing. Other less common syndromes associated with CRC include familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), MUTYH (MYH)-associated polyposis (MAP), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS), hereditary diffuse gastric cancer, serrated polyposis syndrome, Cowden syndrome, and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. If a familial syndrome is suspected, germline genetic testing, such as a hereditary cancer multigene panel, single gene testing, or familial mutation testing, may be appropriate.
Multiple studies have suggested that a lack of vitamin D is associated with poorer outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, other studies have indicated no cancer-specific benefit from vitamin D supplementation. Studies are ongoing, but the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) does not currently recommend routine vitamin D testing in patients with CRC.
Indications for Testing
Laboratory testing for CRC is used to:
- Screen average-risk individuals
- Diagnose and inform prognosis in patients with suggestive signs and symptoms or a family history of CRC
- Monitor for recurrence
- Predict response to treatment
Laboratory Testing
Screening
Screening recommendations for CRC vary. Most guidelines recommend regular CRC screening for individuals 50-75 years of age. Screening may involve visualization (eg, colonoscopy), laboratory testing, or a combination of techniques.
| Test | Recommended Frequency | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stool-Based Testsb | ||
| FIT | Yearly | More accurate than gFOBT
Can be performed with single specimen |
| FOBT (eg, gFOBT) | Yearly | 50% of confirmed CRCs have a negative FOBT
In at-risk patients, consider sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy (even in presence of negative FOBT) Positive FOBT requires further evaluation (eg, colonoscopy) |
| FIT DNA | Not yet determined, but every 3 yrs suggested | Multitargeted stool-based DNA testing; combines FIT with testing for altered DNA biomarkers in cells shed into stool
Reasonable alternative to other stool-based and visualization-based tests Greater single-test sensitivity for detecting CRC compared with FIT alone |
| Serum Test | ||
| Septin9 (SEPT9) methylated DNA | Not yet determined | Biomarker for presence of CRC; high negative predictive value
For individuals who refuse other screening tests and are ≥50 yrs with average risk and no personal history of polyp removal or CRC and no family history of CRC Not recommended for routine screening |
| aAverage risk as defined by ACS: no history of adenoma or IBD; negative family history (having neither first-degree nor second-degree relatives with CRC, nor a clustering of LS-related cancers in the family, and no history of abdominal or pelvic radiation). High-risk patients may require more frequent testing, based on personal or family history of CRC, adenomatous polyp, IBD, or other heritable CRC syndrome; history of abdominal or pelvic radiation.
bPositive tests require follow-up with direct visualization (eg, colonoscopy) ACS, American Cancer Society; ASCO, American Society of Clinical Oncology; FIT, fecal immunochemical test; FOBT, fecal occult blood test; gFOBT, guaiac fecal occult blood test; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network |
||
Diagnosis
Initial Workup
The initial laboratory workup for CRC appropriate for resection includes a CBC, chemistry profile, and CEA baseline measurement.
The initial laboratory workup in patients with suspected metastatic synchronous adenocarcinoma includes a CBC, chemistry profile, and CEA measurement. Tumor KRAS/NRAS testing is also recommended, and BRAF testing should be considered (see RAS Somatic Testing and BRAF Somatic Testing, below).
Histopathology
All polyps removed should be examined histologically. Cancer staging is generally performed via the tumor, node, metastases (TNM) system following surgical exploration and pathologic examination.
Molecular Testing
Tissue from a primary, recurrent, or metastatic colorectal tumor is acceptable for somatic molecular testing because results are similar for these specimen types. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue should be used. Germline genetic testing for hereditary CRC syndromes should be based on clinical presentation and family history, and should be performed in conjunction with genetic consultation. A hereditary cancer multigene panel, single gene testing, or familial mutation testing may be appropriate if a hereditary cancer is suspected.
Microsatellite Instability and Mismatch Repair Somatic Testing
Testing for MSI via polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or for mismatch repair (MMR) protein status via immunohistochemistry (IHC), is recommended in all patients with a history of CRC to evaluate for LS risk. MSI (either low or high) or MMR deficiency identifies patients at high risk. See the Lynch Syndrome ARUP Consult topic for more information.
MSI testing is also useful to determine whether to use adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II disease, and both MSI and MMR testing are useful in treatment selection in stage IV disease. High MSI and MMR deficiency are both associated with a more favorable prognosis in stage II disease and decreased likelihood of metastases.
Extended RAS Somatic Testing
Extended RAS gene testing, specifically KRAS (codons 12 and 13 of exon 2; codons 59 and 61 of exon 3; and codons 117 and 146 of exon 4) and NRAS (codons 12 and 13 of exon 2; codons 59 and 61 of exon 3; and codons 117 and 146 of exon 4), is recommended in all patients with CRC at the diagnosis of stage IV disease or being considered for anti-EGFR therapy. Patients with any known KRAS variant in exons 2, 3, or 4 or NRAS variant in exons 2, 3, or 4 should not receive cetuximab or panitumumab. No specific methodology is recommended for RAS testing. Wild-type KRAS is associated with improved prognosis and increased lymph node retrieval.
BRAF Somatic Testing
BRAF testing is recommended in all patients with metastatic CRC at the diagnosis of stage IV disease and should be considered in patients with wild-type KRAS/NRAS metastatic colon cancer. Wild-type BRAF is associated with improved prognosis and increased lymph node retrieval. Presence of the BRAF V600E variant in patients with MMR-deficient CRC tumors with loss of MLH1 suggests sporadic CRC, although it does not rule out Lynch syndrome. Presence of the BRAF V600E variant also decreases the probability that treatment with panitumumab or cetuximab therapy will be effective without anti-BRAF therapy (eg, vemurafenib); combination therapy is recommended. See the NCCN guidelines for specific regimens.
Monitoring
Careful long-term monitoring is recommended following treatment to assess for complications or recurrence. Recommended monitoring includes a combination of imaging (eg, colonoscopy), clinical assessment, and laboratory testing.
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
Laboratory test-based monitoring in CRC includes serum CEA. CEA should be regularly monitored for changes in concentration from a preoperative baseline. A serially elevated postoperative titer suggests recurrence and requires examination. Stage II, III, and IV tumors warrant measurement of CEA every 3-6 months for 2 years after surgery, then every 6 months for a total of 5 years. Routine CEA measurements are not recommended beyond 5 years because most recurrences take place within 5 years of treatment. Follow-up for an elevated CEA should include imaging and clinical assessment until CEA levels stabilize or disease is discovered.
Pharmacogenetics
Fluorouracil Drugs
MSI-low (MSI-L) or microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors are associated with improved outcomes with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) adjuvant therapy. Patients with low-risk stage II MSI-high (MSI-H) tumors should not be given 5-FU adjuvant therapy. For more information and guidelines on testing for 5-FU sensitivity, see the Germline Pharmacogenetics ARUP Consult topic.
Irinotecan
Decreased UGT1A1 gene expression may lead to drug toxicity, including development of severe neutropenia, from irinotecan. The UGT1A1*28 allele is associated with an increased risk of toxicity. Patients who are heterozygous or homozygous for the *28 allele should receive a reduced starting dose of irinotecan and be treated with caution. Pretreatment testing for UGT1A1*28 should be considered, although guidelines have yet to be established. For additional information and guidelines on UGT1A1 testing, see the Germline Pharmacogenetics ARUP Consult topic.
Fluoropyrimidine
MSI-H status and MMR deficiency are associated with a decreased benefit from fluoropyrimidine adjuvant therapy in stage II disease. Certain variants in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DYPD) are associated with life-threatening toxicity from fluoropyrimidine. These variants are thought to occur in 1-2% of the population; however, universal testing for these variants before fluoropyrimidine treatment is not currently recommended.
Anti-EGFR Therapy
As mentioned above, patients with any known KRAS variant in exon 2, 3, or 4 or NRAS variant in exon 2, 3, or 4 should not receive cetuximab or panitumumab, and presence of the BRAF V600E variant also decreases the probability that treatment with these drugs will be effective without anti-BRAF therapy. Appropriate treatment regimens are detailed in the NCCN guidelines. HER2 overexpression may also predict resistance to anti-EGFR treatment. However, HER2 testing is not currently recommended for treatment planning.
ARUP Laboratory Tests
Screen for CRC
Qualitative Immunoassay
Screen adults of either sex, ≥50 years of age, who have been offered and declined other recommended screening tests
Note: This is a septin9 (SEPT9) methylated DNA test
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Screening test for LS
Polymerase Chain Reaction/Fragment Analysis
Preferred screening test for LS in individuals with CRC
Do not use in endometrial cancer
Qualitative Immunohistochemistry/Qualitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Recommended test to confirm a diagnosis of hereditary gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in individuals with a personal or family history of GI cancer and/or polyposis when a familial variant is unknown
Includes all four MMR genes known to cause LS
Massively Parallel Sequencing/Exonic Oligonucleotide-based CGH Microarray/Sequencing/Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification
Recommended test to confirm diagnosis of hereditary cancer syndrome in individuals with personal or family history consistent with features of more than one cancer syndrome
Massively Parallel Sequencing/Exonic Oligonucleotide-based CGH Microarray
Useful when a pathogenic familial variant identifiable by sequencing is known
Polymerase Chain Reaction/Sequencing
For more information about diagnostic testing for LS, including specific MMR gene testing, see the Lynch Syndrome ARUP consult topic and testing algorithm.
Assess for targeted variants that are useful for prognosis and/or treatment of individuals with solid tumor cancers
For additional test information, refer to the Solid Tumor Mutation Panel Test Fact Sheet
Massively Parallel Sequencing
Monitor patient for tumor recurrence
Quantitative Electrochemiluminescent Immunoassay
Determine eligibility for anti-EGFR (cetuximab and panitumumab) therapy in patients with metastatic CRC
Does not include all codons recommended as part of extended RAS testing
Polymerase Chain Reaction/Pyrosequencing
Predict response to anti-EGFR and MAPK pathway therapies in a variety of malignancies, including CRC
Does not include all codons recommended as part of extended RAS testing
Polymerase Chain Reaction/Pyrosequencing
Detect activating BRAF mutations at codon 600, which can indicate resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in CRC
Also used within LS reflex testing pathway (for CRC specimens only)
Polymerase Chain Reaction/Pyrosequencing
Determine BRAF V600E mutation status in patients with solid tumors to select candidates for targeted therapy with kinase (BRAF and/or MEK) inhibitors; monitor response to therapy and disease progression in patients carrying BRAF V600E mutation
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Predict response to anti-EGFR and MAPK pathway therapies in a variety of malignancies, including CRCs; detect activating NRAS mutations associated with relative resistance to anti-EGFR therapy
Does not include all codons recommended as part of extended RAS testing
Polymerase Chain Reaction/Pyrosequencing
Predict risk of dose-related toxicity to 5-FU therapy
Polymerase Chain Reaction/Fluorescence Monitoring
Use for dosage planning for individuals who will receive high-dose irinotecan (>150 mg/m2), have personal or family history of sensitivity to irinotecan, or have experienced neutropenia while receiving irinotecan
Polymerase Chain Reaction/Fragment Analysis
Medical Experts
Bayrak-Toydemir
Matynia
Wiley
References
-
NCCN - Colon Cancer
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, colon cancer, version 4.2019. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. [Updated: Nov 2019; Accessed: Nov 2019]
Online -
25394175
Hampel H, Bennett RL, Buchanan A, et al. A practice guideline from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors: referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment. Genet Med. 2015;17(1):70-87. Reaffirmed with Addendum: Genet Med. 2019;21(12):2844.
PubMed -
NCCN - Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal - Colorectal, Lynch Vernsion 2.2019
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: colorectal, version 2.2019. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Aug 2019; [Updated: Aug 2019; Accessed: Dec 2019]
Online -
NCCN - Colorectal Cancer Screening, Version 2.2019
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, colorectal cancer screening, version 2.2019. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. [Updated: Aug 2019; Accessed: Dec 2019]
Online -
30802159
Lopes G, Stern MC, Temin S, et al. Early Detection for Colorectal Cancer: ASCO Resource-Stratified Guideline. J Glob Oncol. 2019;5:1-22.
PubMed -
ACS - American Cancer Society Guideline for Colorectal Cancer Screening. For people at average risk
American Cancer Society Guideline for Colorectal Cancer Screening. For people at average risk. American Cancer Society. May 2018; [Revised: May 2018; Accessed: Dec 2019]Online -
27305422
Lin JS, Piper MA, Perdue LA, et al. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016; 315 (23): 2576-94.PubMed
ACS - American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer
ACS - Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests
ACS - Tests to Diagnose and Stage Colorectal Cancer
23813931
21526956
29358889
23988873
Caudle KE, Thorn CF, Klein TE , et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genotype and fluoropyrimidine dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;94(6):640-645.
Choosing Wisely
Choosing Wisely. An initiative of the ABIM Foundation. [Accessed: Aug 2020]
20072938
27979364
20304247
19406918
21090969
Fearon ER. Molecular genetics of colorectal cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2011;6:479-507.
24310308
Hegde M, Ferber M, Mao R, et al. ACMG technical standards and guidelines for genetic testing for inherited colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, and MYH-associated polyposis). Genet Med. 2014;16(1):101-116.
31578196
Helsingen LM, Vandvik POlav, Jodal HC, et al. Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ. 2019;367:l5515.
ASCO - Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Impact of primary (1º) tumor location on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Analysis of CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3504) [Accessed: Dec 2019]
25105762
21040359
CAP - Primary Carcinoma of the Colon and Rectum
College of American Pathologists (CAP). Protocol for the Examination of Specimens from Patients with Primary Carcinoma of the Colon and Rectum. [Posted: Oct 2013; Accessed: Mar 2020]
31683290
19240699
28555630
22272560
28165299
20670148
26471083
25452455
Stoffel EM, Mangu PB, Gruber SB , et al. Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline endorsement of the familial risk-colorectal cancer: European Society for Medical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(2):209-217.
27380959
27226509
19119558
25984847
29846947
22262812
28315031
23650027
29192650
Caliskan A, Kohlmann WK, Affolter KE, Downs-Kelly E, Kanth P, Bronner MP. Intramucosal lipomas of the colon implicate Cowden syndrome. Mod Pathol. 2018;31(4):643-651.
22847155
26963002
24097228
Salk JJ, Bansal A, Lai LA , et al. Clonal expansions and short telomeres are associated with neoplasia in early-onset, but not late-onset, ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19(12):2593-2602.
28881184
27002448
28050782
Samadder J, Valentine JF, Guthery S, et al. Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel diseases: a population-based study in Utah. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62(8):2126-2132.
26826408
27661969
25484364
26740022
23313362
Szankasi P, Reading S, Vaughn CP , et al. A quantitative allele-specific PCR test for the BRAF V600E mutation using a single heterozygous control plasmid for quantitation: a model for qPCR testing without standard curves. J Mol Diagn. 2013;15(2):248-254.
For additional information on tests for LS, see the Lynch Syndrome ARUP Consult topic and testing algorithm.