Heart failure (HF), a common clinical syndrome with high morbidity and mortality, results from a structural or functional cardiac issue that leads to impaired ventricular filling or ejection. The incidence of HF increases with age. Symptoms and signs of HF are nonspecific, which presents a diagnostic challenge. These symptoms include dyspnea, fatigue, exercise intolerance, fluid retention, and edema. Measurement of natriuretic peptides, particularly B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), may be used to support a diagnosis of HF, inform prognosis, guide therapy, and monitor disease progression and therapeutic response. Additional laboratory testing may be used to identify possible HF etiologies or alternative diagnoses, inform prognosis, and monitor treatment and the development of comorbidities.
Quick Answers for Clinicians
Risk factors for heart failure (HF) include hypertension, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, and atherosclerotic disease. Several cardiomyopathies may also lead to the development of HF. Important comorbidities include atrial fibrillation, anemia, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. A thorough laboratory workup including a CBC and urinalysis, as well as electrolyte, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, glucose, hemoglobin A1c, liver enzyme, lipid, and thyroid function tests is recommended to evaluate for risk factors and comorbidities in HF.
Most heart failure (HF) in children is related to congenital heart disease. Recommended initial testing in children includes a CBC, along with electrolyte, glucose, acid-base status, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, liver enzyme, and thyroid function tests. Natriuretic peptide measurement is also recommended to distinguish and confirm HF. Due to the congenital nature of pediatric HF, genetic testing may be useful.
Several emerging biomarkers are currently being researched in heart failure (HF). The measurement of myocardial injury and fibrosis markers (eg, soluble ST2 receptor [sST2], galectin-3 [Gal-3], and GDF-15) has demonstrated utility in risk models for new-onset HF. Furthermore, these markers may provide additional prognostic value when used in conjunction with natriuretic peptide measurement in acute and chronic HF. Markers of renal function may also add value. The use of a multiple-marker strategy (ie, several of these markers tested in conjunction) may improve risk stratification.
Indications for Testing
Laboratory testing for HF may be used to:
- Assess risk of developing new-onset HF
- Support a diagnosis of HF in adult patients who present with signs and symptoms of HF or a history of cardiac disease
- Establish prognosis in adult patients diagnosed with HF
- Monitor disease progression and the effects of treatment
Careful clinical evaluation (including imaging) and patient history are the primary ways to assess patients for HF; however, laboratory testing plays an important role in risk assessment, diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring. A laboratory workup for renal, liver, and thyroid function, as well as anemia and diabetes mellitus, is recommended in suspected or newly diagnosed HF.
Biomarkers may be useful for risk stratification in patients considered to be at increased risk for HF (eg, after myocardial infarction). Natriuretic peptides, particularly BNP and NT-proBNP, are nonspecific markers of cardiac stretch that have been demonstrated to have predictive value for certain types of new-onset HF. Appropriate care after natriuretic peptide-based screening may prevent the development of HF. Serial measurement of troponin levels has also been demonstrated to have predictive value.
Measurement of BNP and NT-proBNP also aids in HF diagnosis and helps to identify patients who require further assessment. Lower values of natriuretic peptides exclude HF, whereas elevated natriuretic peptide values support an HF diagnosis, although natriuretic peptides may be elevated in a number of cardiac and noncardiac conditions. , Natriuretic peptide levels may be reduced in individuals with obesity or in individuals of African or African-Caribbean descent. Levels may also be reduced in those taking diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta blockers, angiotensin II receptor blockers, or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists.
|Nonacute||<35 pg/mL||<125 pg/mL|
|Acute||<100 pg/mL||<300 pg/mL|
NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Although BNP levels are commonly used in HF evaluation, there is substantial diversity in BNP assays, and reference materials to calibrate BNP assays are lacking. Furthermore, the biology of the natriuretic peptides is complex, which results in variation between patients. Therefore, the American Association for Clinical Chemistry suggests using age- and sex-specific reference and clinical decision limits and interpreting results in context. Repeat tests should be performed using the same assay and laboratory to ensure consistency.
Cardiac troponins I or T can also be tested in patients who present with suspected chronic ambulatory or acutely decompensated HF. In addition to acute coronary syndrome, troponins may indicate cardiac ischemia and myocyte damage related to HF.
Serial natriuretic peptide measurements can be used to evaluate the effect of diuretic therapy and monitor volume status in anticipation of hospital discharge, although the usefulness of natriuretic peptide levels to reduce hospital stay or mortality has not been well established. In certain euvolemic patients, BNP or NT-proBNP levels can be used to achieve optimal guideline-directed medical therapy; however, the use of natriuretic peptide-guided therapy in acutely decompensated HF is not well established. Recent guidelines recommend consideration of NT-proBNP measurement for treatment optimization only in a specialist care setting for patients <75 years of age who have HF with reduced ejection fraction and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of >60 mL/min/1.73m2. BNP may not be a suitable biomarker of HF in patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan; NT-proBNP may be more suitable.
Renal Function Monitoring
Serum electrolyte and renal function tests are recommended for serial monitoring in HF, both in the acute and chronic settings, because worsening renal function is associated with a poor prognosis. The frequency of renal function monitoring depends on the clinical status of the patient. Serum electrolytes and renal function tests are also recommended in patients on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and diuretics.
Additional Treatment Monitoring
Measurement of serum digoxin at 8-12 hours following a dose can be used to assess suspected toxicity or nonadherence to digoxin therapy. Liver and thyroid function tests should be offered as part of a routine clinical review in patients taking amiodarone.
Pediatric patients with HF require special consideration because pediatric HF may present differently from adult HF and, unlike adult HF, is primarily linked to congenital heart disease. Recommended initial testing in pediatric patients consists of measuring electrolytes, glucose, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, and thyroid hormone levels, along with liver function tests and a CBC. These tests may be repeated as needed to monitor clinical status. Natriuretic peptides have demonstrated value as confirmatory tests for acute HF in children; NT-proBNP may be more useful due to its longer half-life and higher stability relative to BNP. Cardiac troponins and other biomarkers are of limited utility in pediatric patients. Genetic testing may be useful, as the majority of pediatric cases are thought to have a genetic basis; early identification of a genetic etiology of HF may enable disease-specific treatment and identification of at-risk family members and could guide reproductive counseling.
ARUP Laboratory Tests
Aids in diagnosis, prognosis, and management of acute and chronic HF
Complements prognostic value of natriuretic peptides and aids in risk stratification
Complements prognostic value of natriuretic peptides and aids in risk stratification
Use to monitor blood levels of digoxin
Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure [published correction appears in Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017;70(4):309-310]. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016;69(12):1167.PubMed
Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(16): e147-e239.PubMed
Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation. 2017;136(6):e137-e161.PubMed
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Chronic heart failure in adults: diagnosis and management. Clinical guideline. [Published: Sep 2018; Accessed: May 2020]Online
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Acute heart failure: diagnosis and management. [Updated: Dec 2017; Accessed: Dec 2020]Online
Kantor PF, Lougheed J, Dancea A, et al. Presentation, diagnosis, and medical management of heart failure in children: Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29(12):1535-1552.PubMed
Chow SL, Maisel AS, Anand I, et al. Role of biomarkers for the prevention, assessment, and management of heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(22):e1054-e1091.PubMed
Bayes-Genis A, Ordonez-Llanos J. Multiple biomarker strategies for risk stratification in heart failure. Clin Chim Acta. 22015;443:120‐125.PubMed
de Boer RA, Daniels LB, Maisel AS, et al. State of the Art: Newer biomarkers in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015;17(6):559-569.
Heil B, Tang WH. Biomarkers: Their potential in the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure. Cleve Clin J Med. 2015;82(12 Suppl 2):S28-S35.
Januzzi JL, Mebazaa A, Di Somma S. ST2 and prognosis in acutely decompensated heart failure: the International ST2 Consensus Panel. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(7 Suppl):26B-31B.
Konstam MA, Kiernan MS, Bernstein D, et al. Evaluation and management of right-sided heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(20):e578-e622.
Lindberg S, Jensen JS, Pedersen SH, et al. MR-proANP improves prediction of mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with STEMI. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015;22(6):693-700.
Teerlink JR, Alburikan K, Metra M, et al. Acute decompensated heart failure update. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2015;11(1):53-62.
Ueland T, Gullestad L, Nymo SH, et al. Inflammatory cytokines as biomarkers in heart failure. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;443:71-77.
Wettersten N, Maisel AS. Biomarkers for heart failure: an update for practitioners of internal medicine. Am J Med. 2016;129(6):560-567.
Jasuja GK, Travison TG, Davda M, et al. Age trends in estradiol and estrone levels measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in community-dwelling men of the Framingham Heart Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68(6):733-740.
Javan H, Szucsik AM, Li L, et al. Cardiomyocyte p65 nuclear factor-κB is necessary for compensatory adaptation to pressure overload. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8(1):109-118.
La'ulu SL, Apple FS, Murakami MM, et al. Performance characteristics of the ARCHITECT Galectin-3 assay. Clin Biochem. 2013;46(1-2):119‐122.
Shibayama J, Yuzyuk TN, Cox J, et al. Metabolic remodeling in moderate synchronous versus dyssynchronous pacing-induced heart failure: integrated metabolomics and proteomics study. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0118974.