Inflammation is the body’s innate response to injury or insult, including infection, trauma, surgery, burns, and cancer. Certain proteins are released into the bloodstream during inflammation; if their concentrations increase or decrease by at least 25%, they can be used as systemic inflammatory markers. Although there are many inflammatory markers, also known as acute phase reactants, those most commonly measured in clinical practice (and discussed in this topic) are C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and procalcitonin (PCT). PCT is a newer marker of inflammation that may in certain cases identify or exclude bacterial infections and guide antibacterial treatments. Because these markers are nonspecific, the tests are not diagnostic for any particular condition, but they may help to identify a generalized inflammatory state along with other tests and aid in the differential diagnosis. In some diseases, serial measurements of CRP also may be of prognostic value.
Quick Answers for Clinicians
Besides C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and procalcitonin (PCT), some other markers of inflammation include serum amyloid A, cytokines, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein, plasma viscosity, ceruloplasmin, hepcidin, and haptoglobin. However, high cost, limited availability, and lack of standardization may limit practical clinical use of markers other than CRP, ESR, and PCT in the evaluation of inflammation. Yet some acute phase proteins, for example, alpha-1 antitrypsin, fibrinogen and coagulation factors, and complement factors, serve a role in specific diagnoses. For information on the hepatic proteins albumin, prealbumin (transthyretin), retinol-binding protein (RBP), and transferrin, see the ARUP Consult Hepatic Proteins topic.
Many tests, including those used for measuring erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT), have not been fully standardized or harmonized (ie, the assay and the performance thereof may vary between laboratories, which may lead to significant variation in results ). Thus, results require careful interpretation, given that variation in results may lead to inappropriate clinical decision-making and potentially adverse effects on patient care. Repeat testing should be performed using the same assay and laboratory to maximize consistency. Furthermore, ESR testing requires age- and sex-specific reference limits.
Guided antibiotic stewardship (ABS) is the practice of using biomarkers to guide decisions about initiation and discontinuation of antibiotic treatment to avoid misuse and overuse in patients. Overuse can lead to bacterial resistance to antimicrobial drugs. Both C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels have been shown to be useful tools for the optimization of antibiotic therapy ; because these tests can reveal disease severity and resolution of illness and results can indicate whether antibiotics should be initiated, withheld, or discontinued.
Indications for Testing
Inflammatory processes are a component of a wide range of diseases. CRP, ESR, and PCT are general, nonspecific tools that may be useful in specific scenarios. Measurement of inflammatory marker levels can be used in conjunction with a patient’s overall clinical picture to:
- Aid in the diagnosis of certain suspected inflammatory disorders (eg, ESR is useful for giant cell arteritis and CRP for neonatal sepsis)
- Distinguish between inflammatory and noninflammatory diseases (eg, osteoarthritis versus rheumatoid arthritis or inflammatory bowel disease versus irritable bowel syndrome)
- Manage certain antibiotic therapies (eg, PCT measurements can be used to support shortening the duration of antimicrobial therapy in patients with lower respiratory tract infections)
- Predict recovery (eg, PCT levels can be used to predict 28-day cumulative mortality risk for patients diagnosed with sepsis)
CRP concentrations are a reliable early indicator of active systemic inflammation because they can help differentiate inflammatory from noninflammatory conditions and reflect the severity of the inflammatory insult. CRP is recommended over ESR to detect acute phase inflammation in patients with undiagnosed conditions because it is more sensitive and specific than ESR. CRP has a narrow range of normal values, usually <3-10 mg/L in the blood, but in patients with infections or inflammatory conditions, levels can rise several hundred-fold. CRP is also a useful measure because concentrations change rapidly within the first 6-8 hours after injury, peak after 48 hours, and return to normal levels once the issue has resolved. Additionally, some studies indicate that ratios of serial CRP measurements to the CRP level at admission may be associated with outcomes in critically ill patients. However, in critically ill patients and those in the intensive care unit (ICU), PCT has greater accuracy and may be preferable to CRP, given that the specificity and sensitivity of CRP are lower and peak levels may not correspond to the severity of inflammation.
High-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) is not used for the same purposes as CRP and should not be used in the assessment of general inflammatory processes. For recommended uses for this test, see the ARUP Consult Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Markers topic.
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
ESR is an indirect measurement of plasma protein concentrations and is influenced by a number of disease states. Because the ESR depends on several proteins with varying half-lives, the rate rises and falls more slowly than do CRP concentrations. Furthermore, normal ESR values are specific to age and sex; the rate increases steadily with age and is higher in women than in men. Although CRP measurements have a clear advantage over ESR values, the ESR test remains useful in the diagnosis of select conditions, particularly general bone lesions and osteomyelitis.
The release of PCT into the circulation is most often induced by bacterial infection; however, increases can also result from other causes, including severe viral infection, pancreatitis, tissue trauma, and certain autoimmune disorders. Furthermore, PCT elevations are not usually associated with bacterial colonization, localized bacterial infection, or allergic responses. In the diagnosis of sepsis, increased PCT levels have a high positive predictive value, and normal levels have a high negative predictive value.
PCT measurements can also be used to help personalize treatment, manage antibiotic prescriptions, and reduce antibiotic exposure, which has prompted the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to approve the use of PCT testing to guide antibiotic use in patients with acute respiratory illnesses.
Because CRP levels fall quickly once the cause of inflammation has resolved, CRP is a useful marker for monitoring disease activity and response to or need for treatment. Studies have shown that CRP levels should decrease during the first 48 hours if treatment is adequate; increases in CRP concentrations during the first 48 hours suggest inadequate therapy. Guidelines recommend waiting at least 24 hours before repeating CRP measurements, except in neonates, in whom testing is recommended after 18-24 hours. PCT measurements may provide similarly useful information for treatment decisions and disease monitoring.
ARUP Laboratory Tests
Schuetz P, Beishuizen A, Broyles M, et al. Procalcitonin (PCT)-guided antibiotic stewardship: an international experts consensus on optimized clinical use. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57(9):1308‐1318.
Lelubre C, Anselin S, Boudjeltia KZouaoui, et al. Interpretation of C-reactive protein concentrations in critically ill patients. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:124021.
ABC - C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate: Continuing role for erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Singh G. C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate: continuing role for erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Advances in Biological Chemistry. [Accessed: May 2020]
American Association for Clinical Chemistry. The need to harmonize clinical laboratory test results: a white paper of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry. [Issued: Jul 2015; Accessed: Apr 2022]
Sager R, Kutz A, Mueller B, et al. Procalcitonin-guided diagnosis and antibiotic stewardship revisited. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):15.
Huang DT, Angus DC, Chang CCH, et al. Design and rationale of the Procalcitonin Antibiotic Consensus Trial (ProACT), a multicenter randomized trial of procalcitonin antibiotic guidance in lower respiratory tract infection. BMC Emerg Med. 2017;17(1):25.
Assink-deJong E, de Lange DW, van Oers JA, et al. Stop Antibiotics on guidance of Procalcitonin Study (SAPS): a randomised prospective multicenter investigator-initiated trial to analyse whether daily measurements of procalcitonin versus a standard-of-care approach can safely shorten antibiotic duration in intensive care unit patients--calculated sample size: 1816 patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:178.
Nora D, Salluh J, Martin-Loeches I, et al. Biomarker-guided antibiotic therapy-strengths and limitations. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(10):208.
Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(6):448-454.
Bray C, Bell LN, Liang H, et al. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein measurements and their relevance in clinical medicine. WMJ. 2016;115(6):317-321.
WHO - C-reactive protein concentrations as a marker of inflammation or infection for interpreting biomarkers of micronutrient status
World Health Organization. Department of Nutrition for Health and Development (NHD). C-reactive protein concentrations as a marker of inflammation or infection for interpreting biomarkers of micronutrient status. 2014. [Accessed: Jun 2020]
The Royal College of Pathologists, The Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine, The Institute of Biomedical Science. National minimum retesting intervals in pathology. [Published: Mar 2021; Accessed: Oct 2022]
Osvald EC, Prentice P. NICE clinical guideline: antibiotics for the prevention and treatment of early-onset neonatal infection. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2014;99(3):98-100.